loading...
A number of folks have asked for a more comprehensive ratings system. A few weeks ago I asked everyone for their ideas on some criteria they would like to see and I have tried to present them in a meaningful way. It’s worth mentioning that the criteria cannot be changed after the fact. If I’ve missed anything glaringly obvious we can always start over.
Because larger libraries are, for the most part, not accessible to the average composer, the ratings here will reflect the most accessible, smaller libraries. Also, while any system is subjective and far from perfect, it is at least something!
I will keep the older rating system results available for the time being.
[Update 11-05-2010]: The new ratings system turned out to be more problematic than it was worth so I went back to the old one. I will reiterate what I said above: “Because larger libraries are, for the most part, not accessible to the average composer, the ratings here will reflect the most accessible, smaller libraries. Also, while any system is subjective and far from perfect, it is at least something!”
New rating system is now up and running. There are seven criteria to rate for each company.